![]() I hope this article can be helpful to others. Even better if youĬan record those tests and publish them also as YouTube video. Please leaveĪ comment below if you manage to test them out. Software also using the same setups I use in this video. I really like to see Krita brush performance compared against those Okay guys, if you use any other graphic software. ![]() So, kudos to all of Krita developers for this great achievement. From a user standpoint, regardless of what is going on under the hood, Krita is more performant than Photoshop. Help us to do the tedious calculation so we can focus on the fun stuff, which is making art. We really don’t care what is actually going on in the background because that is exactly what computer supposed do for us. And that is the only thing that matters for us as an artist. All that you feel when drawing in Krita is just buttery smooth performance. All the heavy calculation is done for you automatically in the background. But if you see this from the user perspective that has the “ instant preview” mode always turned on. So, is this means that Krita is not more performant compared to Photoshop or to any other graphic software out there? Well, technically if you look under the hood, yes. Then draw the brush feedback on that smaller canvas size almost instantly, while calculates the real brush stroke in the background progressively. Right? Now, what the smart developer team at Krita did, is that they managed to make Krita to take a smaller version of the canvas. Krita is a free and open-source painting program, originally developed by a team of rag-tag students and later expanded to become a full-scale professional. The larger the data the longer it took to process it. you name it, they all face the same problem. Photoshop, Gimp, Corel Painter, Paint tool SAI, Clip Studio Paint, etc. Essentially all graphic software performance suffered from large image and large brush size due to the amount of data they need to process. ![]() Previously known as “ LOD strokes” or “Level Of Detail strokes”. ![]() This feature is called “ Instant Preview”. Krita uses a brush speed-up mechanism that was funded back in 2015 through a Kickstarter campaign. First, let me explain about the brush previewing technique in Krita. It just “ feel” more performant because it uses different brush previewing technique compared to Photoshop. Now, some of you who are technical geeks may argue that Krita is not more performant. Krita is now officially more performant than Photoshop. But since several releases, especially since version 4.2.1 Krita just open a whole new era that turned the condition upside down. This is the main reason why many people avoid using Krita. And this is just amazing! Because Krita in the old versions of it, is known to be slow and laggy, especially when dealing with large size document and with large size brushes. Currently at version 4.2.1 Krita is actually more responsive than Photoshop. If I had no choice but to use 20 years old Photoshop vs 2018 GIMP, I'd pick the 20 years old software.As you can see in this side-by-side comparison. I still remember how it felt to use the 5.0 release of Photoshop as if it was yesterday's. That's because Photoshop stopped being an overgrown paint-with-layers program since the 1996 release. Just because something is free doesn't make it good or worth considering.Īs a tool for producing content, the GIMP really is more linux's MS paint than photoshop. I know it's free software developed on some hobby developer's free time but that does not make it immune from criticism. Picasa, a free (as in beer, not as in freedom) photo library management and quick photo editing tool that was immensely popular on Windows before Google dropped it, had fast non destructive image editing.Įditing anything in GIMP feels like a painful process that allows no mistake and every single process, even just drawing a damn circle (one that doesn't have heavy artifacts by the way), takes more clicks or keyboard shortcut presses than it ever should. The venerable shareware Paintshop Pro, one of the first popular Photoshop clone, grew that feature. In 20 years, almost every single serious tool for image manipulation has understood that non destructive editing is at the core of productivity. Photoshop had massive, productivity boosting features like Adjustment Layers, since the 4th release, in 1996!! simple non destructive effects were added to the list with 5.0 in 1998. I agree that GIMP is a Linux's Photoshop, not a Linux's MS Paint
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |